Multiple modals

“I might just couldn't see it.”

(Di Paolo 1989)

Multiple modals are instances of more than one modal occurring in a single sentence. (Modals are words like can, might, and should that appear before verbs and express properties like possibility, permission, ability, and obligation). Multiple modals are used in many varieties of English in the Southern United States, as exemplified in the following examples that Di Paolo (1989) includes from Texas's Dawson County and Rusk County:

1)  a. I don't think I have any grants you might could apply for.

b. We might can go up there next Saturday.

c. I may could at Finger's.

d. You know, if you drank a half a drink, you might oughta go home and sleep it off.

e. This thing here I might should turn over to Ann.

f. How is it no one might not would notice that but Anne?

g. Well, once we get under way, it shouldn't oughta take us very long.

Who says this?

Multiple modals are widely attested in South Midland and Southern American varieties of English. Examples are present in the Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States and the Linguistic Atlas of the Gulf States collected in areas that span from Florida to West Texas, and (going north) to southern Pennsylvania and New Jersey. Scholars have examined them in more detail in varieties spoken in Alabama (Feagin 1979), North Carolina and South Carolina (Butters 1973, Coleman 1975, Mishoe and Montgomery 1994), Tennessee (Brandstetter 2003, Hasty 2011), Texas (Pampell 1975, Di Paolo et al. 1979, Boertien 1986, Di Paolo 1986, Di Paolo 1989), and West Virginia (Wolfram and Christian 1976). Labov et al. (1968) noticed some multiple modals in African American speakers in New York City, and Di Paolo (1989) in speakers in Utah. Though multiple modals are common across a wide geographical area and are not stigmatized, the literature reports great discrepancies among speakers in the rate in which they use them.

Syntactic properties

Observed combinations

Multiple modals may contain true modals (can, could, may, might, must, ought to, should, will, and would) as well as quasimodals (better, need to, supposed to, and used to) (Di Paolo 1989). However, not all possible combinations of these modals and quasimodals are observed. See Di Paolo (1989, p. 197), Mishoe and Montgomery (1994, p. 9), and Feagin (1979, p. 157) for lists of the multiple modals that the authors observed in Texas, North and South Carolina, and Alabama, respectively.

Multiple modals most commonly have might or may as their first modal (Di Paolo 1989), though this is not always the case; examples like could might have been observed with might or may second, and other examples like should oughta contain neither might nor may. The most prevalent multiple modals are might could, might can, and might would (Mishoe and Montgomery 1994).

It is possible for multiple modals to contain more than two modals (hence our usage of the name multiple modals rather than the term double modals that many sources use). The following examples from Mishoe and Montgomery (1994) illustrate three instances of triple modals:

2)  a. It's a long way and he might will can't come, but I'm going to ask.

b. I reckon I might should better try to get me a little bit more sleep.

c. Sorry, we don't carry them anymore, but you know, you may might can get one right over there at Wicks.


In questions, it is typically the second modal that inverts with the subject. For example, in all of the following questions, the italicized modal originated after might and then moved to its current position through inversion:

3) a. Heather, could you might find you a seat somewhere?
        (Texas, Di Paolo 1989)

b. Would you might wanna wait til the 8 o'clock flight when it's cheaper?
(Texas, Di Paolo 1989)

c. Could you might go to the store for me?
(Tennessee, Hasty 2011)

d. How could you might do that?
(Tennessee, Hasty 2011)

e. What kind of proposal would John might agree to?
(Tennessee, Hasty 2011)

However, the literature reports that it is also possible for both modals to invert, at least for some speakers, as shown in (4):

4)  a. Might should we have invited Jim?
        (Texas, Di Paolo 1989)

 b. Might could you go to the store for me?
(Tennessee, Hasty 2011)

Some works suggest that different combinations of modals yield different results with regard to to inversion.

Negative clauses

In negative clauses, the negative marker (not or n't) is typically found after the second modal, as in the following examples:

5)  a. I was afraid you might couldn't find it [this address].
         (Texas, Di Paolo 1989)

 b. The mother might should not put a blanket over her baby.
(Texas, Di Paolo 1989)

However, Di Paolo (1989) notes that, in her data, different combinations of modals seem to allow different possibilities for the placement of the negative marker: with might could and might oughta, the negative marker is more often found immediately after might than after the second modal; by contrast, with might should and might would it is more often found immediately after should or would, respectively.

Page contributed by Nick Huang on June 11, 2011

Page updated by Tom McCoy on August 20, 2015

Multiple modals data

(open the map in a new window | see the data in spreadsheet format)

Multiple modals in popular culture

The character Charlie Lange, played by Brad Carter, says, "Tyrone might could tell you where he's at," in the TV show 'True Detective,' season 1 episode 4 (February 9, 2014).

"Let's at least talk about what might could be made better about the private sector, about local communities, about states and keep in Washington what we have to do" was spoken by Jim DeMint on The Daily Show with Jon Stewart (January 11, 2012; 1:27).

A black market gun dealer played by Jim Beaver says, "Either way you're gonna wanna practice your draw. A lot. 'Cause if you're all fingers, well it might could be him keeping a piece instead of you, catch my drift?" in the TV show 'Breaking Bad,' season 4 episode 2 (July 24, 2011).

"I might could" shows up in a painting by Michel Balasis (2007).

"I thought you might could get coffee!" is uttered in an Arlo & Janis comic (January 9, 2006).


Boertien, Harmon S. 1986. Constituent structure of double modals. In Language variety in the South: Perspectives in Black and White, ed. Michael Montgomery and Guy Bailey, 294–318. University of Alabama Press.

Brandstetter, Corinne. 2003. A study in syntactic variation: Double modal constructions. Ms., Georgetown University.

Butters, Ronald R. 1973. Acceptability judgements for double modals in Southern dialects. In New ways of analyzing variation in English, ed. Charles-James N. Bailey and Roger W. Shuy, 276–286. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

Coleman, Willian. 1975. Multiple modals in Southern States English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Indiana.

Di Paolo, Marianna, Charles McClenon, and Kenneth Ranson. 1979. A survey of double modals in Texas. Texas Linguistic Forum 13:40–49.

Di Paolo, Marianna. 1986. A study of double modals in Texas English. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.

Di Paolo, Marianna. 1989. Double modals as single lexical items. American Speech 64:195–224.

Feagin, Crawford. 1979. Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the white community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. See especially pp. 151-185.

Hasty, J. Daniel. 2011. We might should oughta take a second look at this: A syntactic re-analysis of double modals in Southern United States English. Ms., Michigan State University.

Labov, William, Paul Cohen, Clarence Robins, and John Lewis. 1968. A study of the nonstandard English of Negro and Puerto Rican speakers in New York City. Final Report, Cooperative Project No. 3288, United States Office of Education.

McDavid Jr, Raven I., and Raymond K. O'Cain. 1980. Linguistic Atlas of the Middle and South Atlantic States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mishoe, Margaret, and Michael B. Montgomery. 1994. The pragmatics of multiple modal variation in North and South Carolina. American Speech 69:3–29.

Montgomery, Michael B., and Stephen J. Nagle. 1993. Double modals in Scotland and the Southern United States: Transatlantic inheritance or independent development. Folia Linguistica Historica 14:91–107.

Pampell, John R. 1975. More on double modals. Texas Linguistic Forum 2:110– 21.

Pederson, Lee, Susan Leas McDaniel, Guy Bailey, and Marvin Bassett. 1986-92. Linguistic Atlas of the Gulf States. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.

Whitley, M. Stanley. 1975. Dialectal syntax: plurals and modals in Southern American. Linguistics 16:89–108.

Wolfram, Walt, and Donna Christian. 1976. Appalachian speech. Arlington, VA: Center for Applied Linguistics.

Further reading

Battistella, Edwin. 1991. The treatment of negation in double modal constructions. Linguistic Analysis 21:49–65.

Battistella, Edwin. 1995. The syntax of double modal constructions. Linguistica Atlantica 17:19–44.

Boertien, Harmon S. 1979. The double modal construction in Texas. Texas Linguistic Forum 13:14–33.

Boertien, Harmon S., and Sally Said. 1980. Syntactic variation in double modal dialects. Journal of the Linguistic Association of the Southwest 3:210–22.

Dickey, Michael, Elissa Burg, Rachel Goldsborough, Mary Gurry, Jennifer Highsmith, and Kimberly Tester. 2000. A Midwestern double modal. In Proceedings of the thirty sixth regional meeting, ed. Arika Okrent and John Boyle, 207–221. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.

Fennell, Barbara. 1993. Evidence for British sources of double modal constructions in Southern American English. American Speech 68:430–437.

Nagle, Stephen J. 1994. The English double modal conspiracy. Diachronica 11:199–212.